High tech crime, high intellectual crime? Comparing the intellectual capabilities of cybercriminals, traditional criminals, and non-criminals

Are hackers smarter than average? Or are they, like most criminal groups, less intelligent than average? A study from the Netherlands investigated these questions.

The authors had three groups of individuals: (1) people accused of hacking, (2) people accused of crimes that were not cybercrimes, and (3) non-criminals. Groups 2 and 3 were matched to group 1 on age, sex, and country of birth.

The results showed that the accused hackers had previously scored higher (at age ~12) than the other accused criminals on a nationwide school test that covers language, mathematics, and information processing. However, the accused hackers scored lower than the non-criminals on the test and all of its sections.

Converting the results to IQ scores indicates that the accused hackers had average IQs 3.5-4.2 points lower than the non-criminals, but 2.4-2.9 points higher than people accused of non-cyber crimes.

The authors also conducted a sibling control study by identifying the accused hackers’ siblings who had not been accused of a crime and comparing their IQs with the accused hackers’ IQs (controlling for age and sex). The results showed were very similar. Accused hackers had IQs that were 2.8-3.4 lower than their non-criminal siblings. This shows that most of the IQ differences between accused hackers and similar non-criminals are NOT due to confounds that exist between families.

It is important to note that this study was limited to younger accused criminals (avg age = 21.1, SD = 3.1) and that the people in the study had not been convicted of any crime–only accused. The accused hackers were also overwhelmingly male (83.2%), and these characteristics of the sample will limit generalizability. Also, because of the small sample size of the sibling control portion of the study (n = 60 sibling pairs), most of the results were not statistically significant.

Nevertheless, this study provides important insights into IQ variations among people within the criminal justice system. Accused hackers are less intelligent than similar people in the general population, which may show that white-collar crime bears some resemblance to the profile that we see with violent criminals. On the other hand, accused hackers differ in one very important respect – IQ – from other criminals, and that is important for the justice system to acknowledge.

Original post: https://x.com/RiotIQ/status/1971270932279763192?s=20

Full study here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106985

The finding that hackers score between traditional criminals and non-criminals is interesting. They’re smarter than average criminals but still below average overall. The sibling control showing a 2.8-3.4 point gap confirms this isn’t just about family background or SES. This suggests cybercrime attracts people with moderate cognitive ability who can handle technical complexity but aren’t high achievers in legitimate paths. The fact they’re below population average challenges the “genius hacker” stereotype. Most cybercriminals are just moderately capable people choosing crime over legitimate tech careers.

What stands out is that even “high tech” crime is associated with below-average IQ, just not as low as traditional crime. Hackers average maybe 97-98 IQ compared to 94-95 for traditional criminals and 100+ for non-criminals. This makes sense because cybercrime requires some technical skill but still reflects poor decision-making and limited legitimate opportunities. The age factor matters too, these are young offenders who got caught early, so they might represent less sophisticated cybercriminals. More successful hackers probably don’t get arrested at age 21.