Fair Tests for Equal Chances: Insights from IQ Testing in Northern Nigeria

Source: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2475297

This new study in Northern Nigeria explored how well the WISC-IV works for two groups of boys: Almajiri children, who often live on the streets and study in religious Quranic schools, and boys who attend public primary schools.

The results showed a striking 12-point IQ score gap, with public school boys scoring higher on average. This difference highlights the importance of formal schooling in building skills, like understanding words, solving puzzles, and remembering information.

However, the study also demonstrated that the test isn’t fully fair for both groups. This raises important questions about how we measure children’s abilities in diverse settings.

To make the test more suitable for the participants, the research translated it into Hausa, their local language. It also adjusted some questions related to Nigerian life (instead of “winter and summer,” they used “harmattan and rainy season”).

Despite these modifications, some parts of the test didn’t measure skills the same way for both groups. This implies that the IQ gap in memory and overall scores may partly reflect test flaws or differences in life experiences, such as having access to books or parental education, rather than true ability.

These challenges also show how difficult it is to create tests that work equally well for children with such different backgrounds.

The study urges better testing methods in places like Nigeria, where cultural and economic differences have a huge impact on children’s lives. It suggests creating guidelines tailored to groups, like Almajiri children, and revising test questions to enhance fairness. Through these, educators can better understand the children’s capabilities and guide them to succeed.

From what I learned in my guidance and counseling course, we should strengthen the “No Child Left Behind Act” to ensure every child has a fair chance to shine by supporting them in reaching their potential.

1 Like

The 12-point gap is significant, but what’s really important here is that the test itself showed measurement bias meaning part of that gap might be the test not working fairly for Almajiri children rather than true ability differences. The Working Memory Index showing “insufficient equivalence” is a red flag. Street kids might have incredible working memory for survival skills (navigating cities, managing resources, social awareness) but the WISC-IV’s digit span and sequencing tasks don’t capture that. This is a perfect example of why “culture-fair” testing is so hard even with translation and local adaptations, the test still reflects Western educational priorities.

This really highlights how IQ tests can underestimate kids from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Almajiri children scoring lower doesn’t mean they’re less intelligent it means they haven’t been exposed to the specific types of thinking that formal schooling trains. Puzzle-solving, verbal reasoning, processing speed… these are all learnable skills that correlate with classroom experience. The fact that the test showed partial measurement invariance suggests we’re comparing apples to oranges. You can’t fairly measure cognitive potential when one group has books, teachers, and structure while the other is surviving on the streets. The real takeaway: IQ tests reveal opportunity gaps, not ability gaps.

I don’t know if I agree that it’s just “test bias” causing the gap. Formal education literally rewires your brain to handle abstract concepts better. It’s not necessarily that the test is flawed, but that the public school system is actually doing its job by boosting those specific cognitive skills. The gap might be a real reflection of educational privilege rather than just a broken test.

@charles-clayburg763 You’re definitely onto something regarding the “rewiring” aspect because we know formal schooling improves abstract thinking, often called the Flynn Effect. It’s likely a mix of both: the public school kids have better cognitive training for this specific type of task, but the test is also culturally rigid and fails to capture the intense memorization skills the Almajiri kids actually do possess.