A new article in the GCQ journal examines teacher rating scales for selecting kids for gifted programs. The authors’ conclusion is that these scales are mostly just poorly constructed personality scales that favor kids with high conscientiousness and openness to experience.
In other words, they systematically favor compliant kids and “good students,” even if students with other personality traits are just as smart.
Another finding is how little agreement there is among the scales, which is apparent in the image below. Whether a teacher rates a child as “gifted” probably depends a lot on the scale that teacher uses and not the child’s actual traits.
This study raises a lot of fundamental questions about the use of rating scales in gifted programs:
If these scales mostly measure personality, why not just use personality tests?
Why should personality be a consideration at all for selecting kids for gifted programs?
What has the validity process looked like for these scales?
We think that a just using a IQ test battery is a better choice that solves a lot of problems for educators.
Original post: https://x.com/RiotIQ/status/2009647350437028078?s=20
Link to study: 10.1177/00169862251397381

